Golden A' Design Award Winner 2024
The architectural identity woven through these nested circular forms and verdant roof planes operates within multiple symbolic registers simultaneously, the circle itself carrying universal resonance as the geometric embodiment of completeness, eternal return, cosmic order, and the gathering principle that draws community inward toward shared centers, here manifested through two prominent circular green roofs that function as contemporary interpretations of the sacred grove or temple precinct where knowledge seekers assembled in antiquity beneath sheltering canopies to exchange ideas and pursue understanding. The integration of living vegetation atop architectural structures invokes the mythological axis mundi connecting earthly and celestial realms, the planted roof as symbolic representation of paradise gardens suspended between ground and sky, between material foundation and aspirational reach, this vertical layering of programmed space beneath and contemplative landscape above suggesting the dual nature of cultural institutions as both repositories of accumulated knowledge rooted in tradition and living gardens where new growth continually emerges through contemporary engagement and creative reinterpretation. The warm golden illumination emanating from the central circular openings within each green roof circle evokes the archetypal symbolism of sacred fire, the eternal flame of learning and enlightenment that has burned at the heart of knowledge centers across cultures and epochs, from the Library of Alexandria to medieval monasteries to modern research institutions, this warm amber glow suggesting human presence, active engagement, and the transformative warmth of intellectual and creative communion contrasting with the cool neutrality of the white architectural masses that provide protective enclosure. The waterfront positioning establishes the design within the ancient symbolic territory of the threshold between known land and mysterious expansive waters, cultural institutions frequently occupying liminal zones where different realms meet, where the familiar gives way to the unknown, where departure and return, exploration and homecoming find architectural expression through buildings that mediate between human scale and vast natural systems, between intimate enclosure and infinite horizon. The radiating circular geometries read as ripples expanding outward from dropped stones or enlightenment waves propagating from wisdom centers, the formal language suggesting influence extending beyond physical boundaries into surrounding communities through education, cultural programming, and the symbolic presence of institutions devoted to knowledge preservation and transmission. The verdant green of the extensive landscape integration carries complex chromatic symbolism spanning renewal and growth as spring green evokes emergence and potential, harmony and balance as green occupies the center of the visible spectrum mediating between warm and cool, nature and sanctuary as green signals living systems and restorative environments offering respite from dense urban contexts, and hope and continuity as green landscape represents ongoing life cycles and environmental consciousness. The horizontal massing rather than vertical tower typology suggests democratic accessibility and egalitarian principles where cultural resources spread across accessible ground planes rather than ascending into hierarchical heights, the architecture of community and inclusion rather than monuments to authority or power, though the distant vertical tower in the background establishes symbolic relationship between horizontal cultural commons and vertical aspirational landmarks that orient and identify urban districts. The white chromatic neutrality of the architectural volumes operates as blank canvas or tabula rasa suggesting openness to diverse content, programs, visitors, and meanings while simultaneously evoking purity of intention, clarity of purpose, and the refinement associated with cultural institutions as spaces set apart from commercial or industrial functions through material and formal dignity. The nested arrangement of circles within orthogonal geometries represents the ancient philosophical dialogue between circle and square, between heavenly perfection and earthly stability, between divine inspiration and human craft, the integration of these geometric archetypes suggesting synthesis and wholeness where rational structure provides foundation for organic growth and gathering, where institutional mission grounds community experience. The extensive tree plantings in regimented linear progressions along pathways invoke the symbolic vocabulary of sacred groves, philosophers' gardens, and academic quads where tree-lined alleys have traditionally marked processional approaches to temples of learning, the trees as living columns creating vegetative colonnades that frame movement and provide rhythm while connecting visitors to seasonal cycles and natural time as distinct from institutional schedules. The evening or golden hour lighting bathes the entire composition in warm transitional luminosity associated with liminal temporal zones when day gives way to night, work transitions to leisure, and institutional functions extend into community life as cultural centers activate public realm through evening programming, lectures, performances, and gatherings that transform buildings from daytime knowledge repositories into nocturnal civic gathering places illuminated as beacons within urban fabric.
Architecture is the city and the city is the architecture. While enjoying a wide range of city life, people can also feel the green comfort of birds and flowers, which is more memorable than a single book city and park. Shenzhen Book Mall Bay Area Branch, as a new generation of book city under the new model, will be the building itself as the city to create, trying to guide people to rethink the relationship between culture and life.