Golden A' Design Award Winner 2023
Within architectural discourse addressing heritage contexts and contemporary interventions, the timber cladding deployed across the extension's facade carries multiple layers of encoded meaning that extend beyond mere functional weather protection or aesthetic preference, operating within regional building traditions where wood has historically served as primary structural and surface material throughout alpine construction, the vertical board arrangement inviting interpretation as contemporary abstraction of traditional board-and-batten systems common to agricultural and residential vernacular architecture across mountainous regions where timber resources remained abundant and accessible, the warm ochre-to-sienna chromatic range suggesting natural weathering processes that encode temporal passage and material honesty, communicating that the building participates in cycles of aging and patina development rather than resisting environmental interaction through maintenance-intensive finishes, this material choice potentially signifying values including sustainability consciousness, regional identity affirmation, and respect for vernacular wisdom regarding climate-appropriate construction, the rectilinear geometry and restrained fenestration pattern contrasting with the more ornate heritage structure suggests deliberate temporal marking, the extension declining to mimic historical detailing in favor of honest contemporary expression, this architectural candor traditionally associated with modernist ethical positions regarding authenticity and truth to materials, the compositional relationship between horizontal contemporary volume and vertical traditional gables might be read as spatial dialogue between earthbound horizontality suggesting groundedness and integration with landscape versus ascending verticality evoking aspiration and cultural monument, the golden hour illumination bathing both structures in shared atmospheric warmth potentially symbolizing temporal continuity despite stylistic difference, suggesting that light and landscape unite disparate architectural moments within common experiential framework, the curving approach road inscribing S-curve through the composition invites interpretation through journey archetypes, the winding path suggesting gradual revelation and processional experience rather than immediate comprehension, the wooden fencing at right establishing threshold between public circulation and private domestic zones, fences and boundaries carrying traditional symbolic weight as markers of property, identity, and controlled access, the surrounding coniferous trees functioning as natural sentinels or protective enclosure, evergreens across numerous cultural traditions associated with endurance, permanence, and resilience given their retention of foliage through winter dormancy, the distant church spire on the hilltop operating as clear symbolic landmark suggesting spiritual oversight or community focal point, ecclesiastical architecture historically positioned at elevated sites to assert both practical visibility and symbolic authority, the ascending meadows and mountain backdrop potentially evoking sublime landscape traditions where mountain settings symbolize proximity to transcendent or eternal dimensions, alpine regions frequently coded as sites of retreat, purification, and encounter with essential natural forces, the integration of contemporary architectural intervention within this layered symbolic landscape might be interpreted as negotiation between progress and preservation, innovation and tradition, individual expression and collective memory, the material palette emphasizing earth tones and natural weathering suggesting values of humility, environmental responsiveness, and temporal acceptance, the composition as totality inviting contemplation of how built environments encode cultural narratives about appropriate relationships between human construction and natural setting, between contemporary needs and inherited forms, and how architecture itself functions as symbolic communication about community identity, environmental ethics, and the ongoing negotiation between continuity and change within landscapes bearing accumulated cultural meaning across generations of inhabitation and building.
The morphology of the Hotel Villa Madonna extension was determined by the purpose of identifying meaningful relationships with the natural context. This approach has allowed the adoption of an architecture that, while strongly differentiating stylistically and linguistically, manages to converse harmoniously with the more traditional character of the building to which it is juxtaposed. The intervention relates to the existing building by interpreting the basic compositional role using only technical materials that would, however, resume the logic of tradition in mountain buildings.